Meetings first. The organisation when you are ready.
We do the structural and systemic diagnostics that help your meetings, your teams and your whole organisation become more productive. It starts with one meeting, and it goes as far as you want it to.
- 1 Your individual meetings A report and a private read on the conversations you are already having. Free to start
- 2 Your team Seats for the people who convene meetings. The same pattern starts appearing in different rooms. Available
- 3 Your team over time Which couplings keep recurring, which are worth protecting, which are consuming energy. In build — then Team
- 4 Your whole organisation Six dimensions, named relationships, and a ninety-day plan. Across teams and departments. Diagnostic Sprint
- 5 Continuum Structural health watched the way you watch cash — continuously. On the roadmap
Available today Included with a plan Not built yet
Meetings by Unseen Dynamics
See what your last meeting
actually produced.
Everyone knows which meetings were a waste. Nobody can say why, or what to change on Monday. We read the structure of the conversation — what it produced, where it got stuck, and which relationship it got stuck in.
The difference
A notetaker records what was said. We read what it produced.
Not a summary
You were in the meeting. You know what was said. What you cannot see from inside it is whether the conversation could have closed at all — and it usually cannot, for a structural reason nobody named.
Not a personality test
The analysis is the coupling between people or functions, because that is where the work actually gets stuck. It describes how the conversation worked and names who did what in it — never how anyone felt, and never a grade.
Not a survey
Engagement surveys tell you how people feel about conditions. They cannot tell you what the conditions are. When the score drops two points, no survey names the relationship that caused it.
Every read lands in one of three states
Productive, stuck, or damaging — and the path to productive.
The same three states apply to a meeting, a relationship, or a whole organisation. But a state on its own is only a label. Every read also carries the coaching: the specific structural change that would move this exchange toward productive, and what it would take to make it.
The exchange produced something. It moved, and it added more than it consumed.
It ran and produced nothing. The energy went in; nothing came out. Nobody is at fault and nothing is broken — the structure simply cannot close.
It consumed more than it created, and it suppressed the correction that would have fixed it.
What comes back
Three artefacts, and one of them is nobody's business but yours.
The meeting report
What the conversation produced, where it got stuck, and the named relationships involved — Product ↔ Engineering, not “cross-functional collaboration”. Every observation tied to a moment in the conversation.
The memo
A separate document, not a section of the report: what was decided, what was left open, and the action items with a name against each. Emailed to every attendee — yours to forward, paste into a tracker, or hand to someone who wasn't there.
Your personal read
A structural reflection of your own contributions — how they opened or closed the exchange. A mirror, never a grade. Never shown to a host, a manager or an admin.
Restraint
Some meetings come back with nothing.
When there isn't enough of a conversation to read honestly, the report says so in plain words and stops. No score, no hedged paragraph, no invented pattern.
It happens when only one person really spoke, when there were too few exchanges for a pattern to show, or when too little came through clearly. Length has nothing to do with it — a fast two-minute exchange can be readable, and a long monologue is not. Nothing is wrong with the meeting. It just didn't have enough in it.
A tool that always has an opinion is a tool that is guessing.
From a real report
“There wasn't enough of this meeting captured to read it honestly. Only one person's speech came through, so there was no back-and-forth between people to read.
Rather than offer a reading the recording can't support, we'd rather say plainly that this one didn't have enough in it. Nothing is wrong with the meeting itself — this is about what reached us from it.”
The climb
One meeting, then a team, then the organisation.
Each step pays for the person on it. And each one makes the next sharper, because the read improves with accumulated history — which is the one thing you cannot buy later.
Your individual meetings Available
Capture your meetings. You and every participant gets their report, and everyone their own private read. Two hours a week back is a normal first result, and it is enough on its own.
The team Available
Seats for the people who convene meetings. The same relationship starts appearing in different rooms, and the team gets language for something several of them had felt and none could name.
The team over months In build
The structural view across a team's meetings over time: which couplings keep appearing, which are worth protecting, which are quietly consuming energy. Available only in the Team subscription once it ships.
The whole organisation Available
The Diagnostic Sprint. Six dimensions, named relationships, every finding cited, and a ninety-day plan with numbers on it. Back within hours of your inputs.
Across teams and departments In build
The boundaries between functions, and whether the ninety-day plan actually changed the structure rather than the mood. Available only in the Diagnostic Sprint.
Customer-facing teams, and Continuum On the roadmap
The same instrument turned outward at the relationships that produce revenue, and eventually structural health watched continuously. Neither is built. We describe them as intent and we do not sell them.
What it is worth
A recurring Tuesday hour goes through nobody.
A €200,000 consulting project gets a business case and a board paper. A weekly hour with eight people in it gets no invoice at all. Here is what one costs, on Eurostat's 2025 labour data.
Privacy is the product, not a policy page
Built to survive a works council.
Transcription runs on our own hardware
Audio is transcribed on a machine we own, in the EU, on self-hosted Whisper. There is no third-party transcription service in the path. The audio is deleted within minutes after the transcription has been successfully saved.
Personal reads are subject-only
No manager, workspace admin or Unseen Dynamics staff account can access an individual's personal read. Two of the four layers enforcing that are in the database itself, not promised in a policy — and there is one limit we will not paper over.
The notetaker is visible
It appears in the participant list as notetaker@unseendynamics.ai, described as Unseen Dynamics — transcribing & analysing. There is a public notice page for participants, and the host confirms three specific attestations before anything is captured.
Anyone can object — account or not
Ask the host not to analyse a meeting, remove the notetaker mid-call, pause capture for the whole workspace, or use our public erasure-request form with no account at all.
Read the full privacy notice · The works-council pack · If you were in a captured meeting
Where it comes from
Published research, and what we will not claim.
The Polarity Model is the framework underneath both products. Three papers are published with DOIs on Zenodo. They are preprints — we describe them as published research, never as peer-reviewed, because a numerate reader will check.
We have no client results yet. We are running our first engagements and building the reference base. What we can show you is the instrument, a sample report, the research, and the behaviour of the system — including the meetings where it refuses to answer at all. For most serious buyers that last part is more persuasive than a testimonial would be.
Start here
Start with one meeting.
A permanent free account with three meetings to use in your first fourteen days. Unused ones expire at the end of the fourteen days; meetings you buy never do. No card. If the first report doesn't tell you something you didn't know, stop.
Google Meet and Microsoft Teams. Reports in English, Estonian, Finnish, Russian and more.